# MI-031: Brain-computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review

> 本页由本地论文卡片生成。请不要直接编辑本页；修改源卡片后运行 `vp run docs:generate`。

> 中文支持说明：本页是中文站点镜像，保留论文标题、证据状态和来源字段的原始表述，避免未经核实的翻译改变证据边界。

> 内部 wiki 边界：本页提供论文卡片证据和用户提供的 PDF 下载入口，仅用于私有阅读；全文抽取文本不发布。

> 来源: `library/paper_cards/MI-031.md`

## 论文访问

* 内部 PDF: <a href={"/papers/MI-031.pdf"} download style={{ display: "inline-flex", alignItems: "center", justifyContent: "center", minHeight: "2.25rem", padding: "0.45rem 0.8rem", borderRadius: "6px", backgroundColor: "#047857", color: "#ffffff", fontWeight: 700, lineHeight: 1, textDecoration: "none", boxShadow: "0 1px 2px rgba(15, 23, 42, 0.22)" }}>下载论文 PDF</a>
* DOI / 官方页面: [10.1186/s12984-021-00820-8](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00820-8)
* 部署边界: 这些 PDF 链接只适合私有/受保护的内部 wiki。

## MI-031: Brain-computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review

## Metadata

* ID: MI-031
* Title: Brain-computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
* Year: 2021
* DOI / URL: 10.1186/s12984-021-00820-8
* Local PDF: 见上方论文访问区块
* Text artifact: local-only path withheld from docs site
* Review status: `extracted`

## Study Type

* Track: MI / BCI robotics / rehabilitation
* Task: systematic review of BCI-hand robotic systems for stroke rehabilitation
* Participants or dataset: 30 eligible studies; 11 involved people who had stroke
* Device/electrode setup: EEG BCI plus hand robotic systems across reviewed studies
* Protocol/task: hand rehabilitation and fine motor skill recovery after stroke

## Methods

* Signal processing or analysis: review of system design, participant characteristics, technical specifications, and clinical outcomes
* Training/calibration: rehabilitation protocols across studies
* Online/offline: systematic review

## Key Results

* The review identifies 30 eligible studies and profiles technical/clinical maturity.
* It concludes that many systems remain prototype or preclinical.

## Limitations

* Review evidence does not prove the current project has therapeutic effect.
* Heterogeneity across robotic devices, BCI paradigms, and clinical outcomes is high.
* Clinical claims require separate study design.

## Relevance To Current Review

* Useful for the rehabilitation product direction.
* Supports caution: BCI-robotics rehabilitation is promising but clinically complex.

## Evidence Status

| Claim | Status | Evidence Note |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BCI-robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke has a systematic review base. | verified | Abstract reports the review scope and 30 eligible studies. |
| Many systems remain prototype or preclinical. | verified | Abstract conclusion states 19 of 30 studies were prototype or preclinical. |
| SAH-BRI-Grasp currently has clinical rehabilitation evidence. | needs confirmation | No project clinical trial exists. |

## Open Questions

* Which rehabilitation claims belong in future product roadmap rather than the first paper?
* Should robotic grasping and rehabilitation be separate experimental tracks?